The peer review process addresses the critical need to ensure that published research meets high standards of rigor, clarity, and relevance to the field of TVET. This particular manuscript presented findings on a crucial topic (digital literacy in TVET) and required careful evaluation to ensure its contribution to the body of knowledge. The data reviewed consisted of a full manuscript submitted by the authors, including: Abstract, Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Results, Discussion and Conclusion, References

The review identified both strengths and weaknesses in the manuscript. While the study addressed a relevant topic and employed appropriate methodology, concerns were raised regarding the sample size, lack of detailed description of digital literacy skills assessed, and the need to explore other factors influencing academic performance. The review recommended revisions to the manuscript, including: Increasing the sample size to enhance generalizability. Providing a more comprehensive description of the digital literacy skills measured. Considering a longitudinal study design to assess long-term impacts. Exploring additional factors that may contribute to academic performance. Offering specific recommendations for educators and policymakers on integrating digital literacy into TVET curricula.

The review was conducted using the JTET Reviewer Form 2020/4, which provides a structured framework for assessing various aspects of the manuscript, including: Importance and originality of the topic. Clarity of research goals and objectives. Adequacy of research methods. Interpretation and presentation of results. Implications for TVET practice and policy. Writing quality and clarity